Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Prémio

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Médio-alto

Uniroyal

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Winter

Test profile

Blizzak LM-001

MS plus 77

WR D4

UltraGrip Performance+

UltraGrip Performance 3

Número de testes

15

19

26

23

24

Best position

#4

#3

#2

#1

Average position

7.9

11.2

6.0

3.3

2.7

Teste mais recente

2018

2021

2019

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

132

76

82

176

302

Molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Nokian WR D4

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Nokian WR D4

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Nokian WR D4

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Nokian WR D4

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Frenagem úmida

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Nokian WR D4

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Curva em círculo molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Nokian WR D4

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Desempenho em molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Nokian WR D4

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Nokian WR D4

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Travagem a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Nokian WR D4

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Desempenho em piso seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Nokian WR D4

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Comportamento em condução seca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Nokian WR D4

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

100%

Manuseamento a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Nokian WR D4

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Nokian WR D4

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Travagem de neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Nokian WR D4

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Manipulação da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Nokian WR D4

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

62%

Tracção na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Nokian WR D4

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Custos

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Nokian WR D4

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Eficiência de combustível

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Nokian WR D4

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Preço/valor

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Nokian WR D4

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Resistência ao rolamento

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Nokian WR D4

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Quilometragem

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Nokian WR D4

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Nokian WR D4

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Ruído exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Nokian WR D4

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Ruído interior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Nokian WR D4

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Nokian WR D4

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Travagem brusca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Nokian WR D4

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Orientação lateral do gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Nokian WR D4

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

86%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak LM-001

MS plus 77

WR D4

UltraGrip Performance+

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Neve

Custos

Conforto

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação