4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Michelin ALPIN 7 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow
Michelin
ALPIN 7
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Número de testes
15
19
8
6
23
Best position
#4
#3
#12
#1
#1
Average position
7.9
11.2
22.3
3.7
6.7
Teste mais recente
2018
2021
2021
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
132
76
43
62
107

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
72%
Michelin ALPIN 7
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
Michelin ALPIN 7
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
Michelin ALPIN 7
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
Michelin ALPIN 7
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
84%
Michelin ALPIN 7
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
Michelin ALPIN 7
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
Michelin ALPIN 7
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
Michelin ALPIN 7
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
Michelin ALPIN 7
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
Michelin ALPIN 7
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
Michelin ALPIN 7
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
Michelin ALPIN 7
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
82%
Michelin ALPIN 7
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
Michelin ALPIN 7
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
Michelin ALPIN 7
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
Michelin ALPIN 7
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
81%
Michelin ALPIN 7
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
60%
Michelin ALPIN 7
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação