Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Prémio

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Médio-alto

Uniroyal

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Blizzak LM-001

MS plus 77

MP92 Sibir Snow

WinterCraft WP52+

Número de testes

15

19

8

3

Best position

#4

#3

#12

#4

Average position

7.9

11.2

22.3

4.3

Teste mais recente

2018

2021

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

132

76

43

97

Molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Frenagem úmida

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Curva em círculo molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Travagem a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Manuseamento a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Tracção na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Travagem de neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Manipulação da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Custos

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Preço/valor

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Resistência ao rolamento

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Quilometragem

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Ruído exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-001

MS plus 77

MP92 Sibir Snow

WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Neve

Custos

Conforto

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação