Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Prémio

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Médio-alto

Uniroyal

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test profile

Blizzak LM-001

MS plus 77

MP92 Sibir Snow

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterContact TS 870

Número de testes

15

19

8

23

17

Best position

#4

#3

#12

#1

Average position

7.9

11.2

22.3

3.3

1.7

Teste mais recente

2018

2021

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

132

76

43

176

80

Molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Frenagem úmida

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

93%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Curva em círculo molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Travagem a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Comportamento em condução seca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

78%

Manuseamento a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Custos

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

Quilometragem

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

83%

Preço/valor

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

68%

Resistência ao rolamento

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Travagem de neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Manipulação da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Tracção na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Ruído exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Ruído interior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

98%

Gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Travagem brusca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Blizzak LM-001

MS plus 77

MP92 Sibir Snow

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Custos

Neve

Conforto

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação