4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Pirelli
Cinturato Winter
Semperit
Speed-Grip 5
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
15
16
12
17
Best position
#4
#3
#3
#1
Average position
7.9
8.4
9.3
1.7
Teste mais recente
2018
2021
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
132
57
93
80

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
79%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
88%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
93%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
77%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
58%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
80%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Desempenho em molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
81%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
83%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
73%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
74%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
74%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
74%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
49%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
70%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
80%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
64%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
52%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
61%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
65%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
45%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Eficiência de combustível
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
81%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
86%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
86%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
87%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
86%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
79%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
83%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
74%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
84%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
28%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
84%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
85%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
28%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação