4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001Prémio
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21
Matador MP92 Sibir SnowBudget
MatadorMatador

MP92 Sibir Snow

R15 – R18
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Número de testes
15
8
23
3
Best position
#4
#12
#1
#4
Average position
7.9
22.3
3.3
4.3
Teste mais recente
2018
2021
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
132
43
176
97

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação