4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
15
8
24
17
Best position
#4
#12
#1
#1
Average position
7.9
22.3
2.7
1.7
Teste mais recente
2018
2021
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
132
43
302
80

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Desempenho em piso seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação