Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Prémio

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Médio-alto

Kumho

WinterCraft WP71

R16 – R19

Prémio

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0

R15 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Blizzak LM-001

WinterCraft WP71

UltraGrip Performance+

Número de testes

15

11

23

Best position

#4

#6

#1

Average position

7.9

12.5

3.3

Teste mais recente

2018

2020

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

132

57

176

Molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Frenagem úmida

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Curva em círculo molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Travagem a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Manuseamento a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Custos

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Preço/valor

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Resistência ao rolamento

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Quilometragem

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Travagem de neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Manipulação da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Tracção na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Ruído exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Ruído interior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-001

WinterCraft WP71

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Custos

Neve

Conforto

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação