Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Prémio

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Prémio

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7

R13 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Blizzak LM-001

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

Número de testes

15

23

3

Best position

#4

#1

#4

Average position

7.9

3.3

4.3

Teste mais recente

2018

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

132

176

97

Molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Frenagem úmida

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Curva em círculo molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Travagem a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Manuseamento a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Custos

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Preço/valor

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Resistência ao rolamento

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Quilometragem

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Travagem de neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Manipulação da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Tracção na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Ruído exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Ruído interior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-001

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Custos

Neve

Conforto

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação