4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Nokian
WR D4
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
15
14
26
17
Best position
#4
#3
#2
#1
Average position
7.9
16.0
6.0
1.7
Teste mais recente
2018
2020
2019
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
132
66
82
80

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
67%
Nokian WR D4
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
Nokian WR D4
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Nokian WR D4
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Nokian WR D4
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Nokian WR D4
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Desempenho em molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
81%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
62%
Nokian WR D4
71%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
Nokian WR D4
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Nokian WR D4
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Nokian WR D4
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
Nokian WR D4
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Nokian WR D4
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Desempenho em piso seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Nokian WR D4
76%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Nokian WR D4
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Nokian WR D4
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Nokian WR D4
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Nokian WR D4
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
Nokian WR D4
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
92%
Nokian WR D4
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Nokian WR D4
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Nokian WR D4
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Eficiência de combustível
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Nokian WR D4
86%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Nokian WR D4
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Nokian WR D4
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
68%
Nokian WR D4
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Nokian WR D4
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Nokian WR D4
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Nokian WR D4
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação