4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Número de testes
15
23
3
Best position
#4
#1
#4
Average position
7.9
2.3
4.3
Teste mais recente
2018
2021
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
132
76
97

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Desempenho em molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Desempenho em piso seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Eficiência de combustível
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação