4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
15
23
17
Best position
#4
#1
#1
Average position
7.9
6.7
1.7
Teste mais recente
2018
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
132
107
80

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação