Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5

Prémio

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Budget

Barum

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterContact TS 870 P

Test profile

Blizzak LM-001

Polaris 3

MS plus 77

WR D4

Snowtrac 5

Número de testes

15

10

19

26

12

Best position

#4

#3

#2

#4

Average position

7.9

10.6

11.2

6.0

12.6

Teste mais recente

2018

2021

2019

Tamanhos disponíveis

132

67

76

82

57

Molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Barum Polaris 3

74%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Nokian WR D4

71%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

70%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Nokian WR D4

69%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

71%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Nokian WR D4

73%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

69%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Barum Polaris 3

65%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Nokian WR D4

76%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

73%

Frenagem úmida

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Barum Polaris 3

84%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Nokian WR D4

70%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

67%

Desempenho em molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Nokian WR D4

71%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

70%

Curva em círculo molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Nokian WR D4

72%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

73%

Seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Nokian WR D4

80%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

84%

Travagem a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Nokian WR D4

81%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

82%

Comportamento em condução seca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Nokian WR D4

72%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

78%

Manuseamento a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Nokian WR D4

78%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

89%

Desempenho em piso seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Nokian WR D4

76%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

80%

Neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Nokian WR D4

92%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

82%

Tracção na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Barum Polaris 3

89%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Nokian WR D4

89%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

84%

Travagem de neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Nokian WR D4

91%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

85%

Manipulação da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Nokian WR D4

91%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

79%

Custos

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Nokian WR D4

87%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

75%

Preço/valor

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Barum Polaris 3

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Nokian WR D4

79%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

65%

Resistência ao rolamento

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Barum Polaris 3

84%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Nokian WR D4

99%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

80%

Quilometragem

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Barum Polaris 3

68%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Nokian WR D4

67%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

65%

Eficiência de combustível

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Nokian WR D4

86%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

88%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Nokian WR D4

71%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

66%

Ruído exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Nokian WR D4

69%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

61%

Ruído interior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Nokian WR D4

69%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

67%

Gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Nokian WR D4

83%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

81%

Travagem brusca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Nokian WR D4

85%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

83%

Orientação lateral do gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Nokian WR D4

82%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

80%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Testes mútuos

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Inverno	2016	205/55 R16	Ver
Autobild	Inverno	2016	205/55 R16	Ver
ADAC	Inverno	2016	185/65 R15	Ver

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5

Blizzak LM-001

Polaris 3

MS plus 77

WR D4

Snowtrac 5

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Neve

Custos

Conforto

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Testes mútuos

Contribuir para a comparação