Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Prémio

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Budget

Barum

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Blizzak LM-001

Polaris 3

MS plus 77

MP92 Sibir Snow

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Número de testes

15

10

19

8

23

Best position

#4

#3

#12

#1

Average position

7.9

10.6

11.2

22.3

6.7

Teste mais recente

2018

2021

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

132

67

76

43

107

Molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Barum Polaris 3

74%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

72%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Barum Polaris 3

65%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Frenagem úmida

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Barum Polaris 3

84%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Curva em círculo molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Travagem a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Manuseamento a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Tracção na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Barum Polaris 3

89%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Travagem de neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Manipulação da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

82%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Custos

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Preço/valor

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Barum Polaris 3

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

87%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Resistência ao rolamento

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Barum Polaris 3

84%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Quilometragem

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Barum Polaris 3

68%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

70%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Ruído exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

83%

Gelo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Travagem brusca

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Testes mútuos

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Inverno	2017	225/50 R17	Ver

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Blizzak LM-001

Polaris 3

MS plus 77

MP92 Sibir Snow

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Neve

Custos

Conforto

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Testes mútuos

Contribuir para a comparação