4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Barum
Polaris 3
Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Número de testes
15
10
8
23
23
Best position
#4
#3
#12
#1
#1
Average position
7.9
10.6
22.3
6.7
2.3
Teste mais recente
2018
2018
2021
2025
2021
Tamanhos disponíveis
132
67
43
107
76

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Barum Polaris 3
74%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Barum Polaris 3
65%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Desempenho em molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Desempenho em piso seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Barum Polaris 3
89%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Eficiência de combustível
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Barum Polaris 3
81%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Barum Polaris 3
68%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Testes mútuos

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2017225/50 R17Ver

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação