4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
14
10
18
3
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
3.6
6.0
6.1
3.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2024
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
188
104
47
40

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Desempenho em molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Guia lateral húmida
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Encanto da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Mudança de faixa seca
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Desempenho em piso seco
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Resposta da direcção seca
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação