Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Prémio

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

VS

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7

R13 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Blizzak 6

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

WinterCraft WP52+

Número de testes

14

3

Best position

#1

#3

#4

Average position

3.6

9.7

4.3

Teste mais recente

2025

2024

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

188

32

97

Molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

57%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Frenagem úmida

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

56%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

54%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

48%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Curva em círculo molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Desempenho em molhado

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

82%

Neve

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Tracção na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Travagem de neve

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Manipulação da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Encanto da neve

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Desempenho na neve

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

88%

Seco

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

53%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Travagem a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

63%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Manuseamento a seco

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

44%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Desempenho em piso seco

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Mudança de faixa seca

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Custos

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Resistência ao rolamento

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Quilometragem

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

45%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Preço/valor

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Ruído exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Conforto

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

57%

Todo-o-terreno

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak 6

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Molhado

Neve

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Todo-o-terreno

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação