4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
14
16
10
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#2
Average position
3.6
5.5
6.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2023
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
188
153
104
40

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Desempenho em molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Encanto da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Mudança de faixa seca
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Desempenho em piso seco
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Resposta da direcção seca
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação