4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Número de testes
13
3
Best position
#7
#4
Average position
11.9
4.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
15
78
97

Seco

Seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
73%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
72%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Desempenho em piso seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
77%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%

Neve

Neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
52%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Desempenho na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
Travagem de neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Manipulação da neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
82%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
27%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Tracção na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%

Gelo

Gelo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
85%

Custos

Custos
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
87%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
87%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Conforto

Conforto
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
55%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Ruído exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
72%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação