4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Número de testes
23
27
17
49
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.7
8.1
1.7
3.2
Teste mais recente
2025
2021
2025
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
107
25
80
213

Molhado

Molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Frenagem úmida
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Curva em círculo molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%

Seco

Seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Manuseamento a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Mudança de faixa seca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Resposta da direcção seca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Comportamento em condução seca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
53%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Neve

Neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Tracção na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Travagem de neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Manipulação da neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Encanto da neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Desempenho na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%

Conforto

Conforto
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ruído exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Conforto
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Ruído interior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Custos

Custos
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Resistência ao rolamento
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Preço/valor
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Eficiência de combustível
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%

Gelo

Gelo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Travagem brusca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Orientação lateral do gelo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação