4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Dunlop
Winter
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
23
28
49
2
24
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
6.7
8.0
3.2
1.5
2.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
107
115
213
65
302

Molhado

Molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Frenagem úmida
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Dunlop Winter
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Dunlop Winter
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Dunlop Winter
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Curva em círculo molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Dunlop Winter
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Desempenho em molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
76%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Seco

Seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Dunlop Winter
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Manuseamento a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Dunlop Winter
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Resposta da direcção seca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Mudança de faixa seca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Comportamento em condução seca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Desempenho em piso seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Dunlop Winter
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Neve

Neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Tracção na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Dunlop Winter
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem de neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Manipulação da neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Dunlop Winter
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Encanto da neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Dunlop Winter
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Desempenho na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Dunlop Winter
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Conforto

Conforto
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Ruído exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Conforto
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Ruído interior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Custos

Custos
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Dunlop Winter
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Dunlop Winter
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Preço/valor
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Dunlop Winter
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Eficiência de combustível
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%

Gelo

Gelo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Travagem brusca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Orientação lateral do gelo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação