4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Michelin
ALPIN 6
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
23
25
31
17
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.7
12.4
4.4
1.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
107
54
76
80

Comparação de desempenho

Média de 2 testes

Desempenho em molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
60%
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
73%
Michelin
ALPIN 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Frenagem úmida
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
62%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
46%
Michelin ALPIN 6
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
52%
Michelin ALPIN 6
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Curva em círculo molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
51%
Michelin ALPIN 6
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
64%
Michelin ALPIN 6
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem transversal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
89%
Michelin ALPIN 6
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Desempenho em piso seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
62%
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
78%
Michelin
ALPIN 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
66%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
58%
Michelin ALPIN 6
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
75%
Manuseamento a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
61%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
65%
Michelin ALPIN 6
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Desempenho na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
73%
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
73%
Michelin
ALPIN 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Travagem de neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
81%
Michelin ALPIN 6
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
79%
Michelin ALPIN 6
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Manipulação da neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
65%
Michelin ALPIN 6
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Curvas em círculo na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
67%
Michelin ALPIN 6
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Conforto e ruído
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
77%
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
84%
Michelin
ALPIN 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Ruído externo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
63%
Michelin ALPIN 6
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
77%
Conforto ao rodar
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
90%
Michelin ALPIN 6
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
71%
Economia
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
76%
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Michelin ALPIN 6
86%
Michelin
ALPIN 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Resistência ao rolamento
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
69%
Michelin ALPIN 6
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
82%
Michelin ALPIN 6
98%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Inverno
2024205/55 R16Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2021205/55 R16Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação