4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Barum
Polaris 5
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Número de testes
23
13
28
3
Best position
#1
#9
#2
#4
Average position
6.7
15.2
8.0
4.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
107
76
115
97

Molhado

Molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Barum Polaris 5
62%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Frenagem úmida
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Barum Polaris 5
63%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Barum Polaris 5
64%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Barum Polaris 5
65%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Barum Polaris 5
56%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Curva em círculo molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Barum Polaris 5
66%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Desempenho em molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%

Seco

Seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Barum Polaris 5
71%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Barum Polaris 5
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Manuseamento a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Barum Polaris 5
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Desempenho em piso seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Comportamento em condução seca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Barum Polaris 5
51%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
76%

Neve

Neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Tracção na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Travagem de neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Barum Polaris 5
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Manipulação da neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Encanto da neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Barum Polaris 5
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Desempenho na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%

Conforto

Conforto
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Barum Polaris 5
73%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Ruído exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Barum Polaris 5
74%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Conforto
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Barum Polaris 5
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
83%
Ruído interior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%

Custos

Custos
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Barum Polaris 5
80%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Barum Polaris 5
82%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Barum Polaris 5
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Preço/valor
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Barum Polaris 5
86%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Eficiência de combustível
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%

Gelo

Gelo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Barum Polaris 5
82%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
Travagem brusca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Barum Polaris 5
77%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Orientação lateral do gelo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Barum Polaris 5
87%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação