Comparação: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Médio-alto

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Advantage

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Número de testes

14

4

3

2

Best position

#8

#3

#2

#1

Average position

13.4

12.0

3.3

1.0

Teste mais recente

2026

2025

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

153

111

40

23

Molhado

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Frenagem úmida

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Curva em círculo molhado

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Guia lateral húmida

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Seco

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Travagem a seco

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Manuseamento a seco

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Mudança de faixa seca

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Resposta da direcção seca

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Conforto

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Ruído exterior

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Conforto

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Custos

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Resistência ao rolamento

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Quilometragem

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Advantage

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação