Comparação: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Médio-alto

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Número de testes

14

3

1

3

Best position

#8

#2

#1

#2

Average position

13.4

3.3

1.0

3.7

Teste mais recente

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

153

40

64

34

Molhado

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Frenagem úmida

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Curva em círculo molhado

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Guia lateral húmida

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Seco

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Travagem a seco

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Manuseamento a seco

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Mudança de faixa seca

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Conforto

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ruído exterior

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Conforto

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Custos

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Resistência ao rolamento

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Quilometragem

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação