4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Número de testes
6
3
6
Best position
#6
#2
#3
Average position
19.3
3.3
4.7
Teste mais recente
2019
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
2
40
146

Molhado

Molhado
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Curva em círculo molhado
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Custos

Custos
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Quilometragem
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Conforto

Conforto
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Ruído exterior
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Seco

Seco
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Manuseamento a seco
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação