4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
6
6
3
Best position
#6
#3
#2
Average position
19.3
4.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2019
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
2
146
40

Molhado

Molhado
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Curva em círculo molhado
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Custos

Custos
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Seco

Seco
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Manuseamento a seco
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Conforto

Conforto
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação