4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Barum Polaris 5 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Barum
Polaris 5
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Michelin
ALPIN 6
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Número de testes
13
15
31
23
3
Best position
#9
#6
#1
#1
#4
Average position
15.2
15.5
4.4
6.7
4.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
76
28
76
107
97

Molhado

Molhado
Barum Polaris 5
62%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Michelin ALPIN 6
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Frenagem úmida
Barum Polaris 5
63%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Michelin ALPIN 6
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Barum Polaris 5
64%
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Michelin ALPIN 6
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Barum Polaris 5
56%
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Michelin ALPIN 6
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Barum Polaris 5
65%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Michelin ALPIN 6
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Curva em círculo molhado
Barum Polaris 5
66%
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Michelin ALPIN 6
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Seco

Seco
Barum Polaris 5
71%
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Michelin ALPIN 6
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Travagem a seco
Barum Polaris 5
69%
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Michelin ALPIN 6
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Manuseamento a seco
Barum Polaris 5
78%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Michelin ALPIN 6
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Comportamento em condução seca
Barum Polaris 5
51%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Michelin ALPIN 6
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Neve

Neve
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
Michelin ALPIN 6
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Tracção na neve
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Michelin ALPIN 6
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Travagem de neve
Barum Polaris 5
78%
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
Michelin ALPIN 6
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Manipulação da neve
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Michelin ALPIN 6
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Encanto da neve
Barum Polaris 5
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Michelin ALPIN 6
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%

Conforto

Conforto
Barum Polaris 5
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Michelin ALPIN 6
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Ruído exterior
Barum Polaris 5
74%
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Michelin ALPIN 6
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Conforto
Barum Polaris 5
61%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Michelin ALPIN 6
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Ruído interior
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Michelin ALPIN 6
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Custos

Custos
Barum Polaris 5
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Michelin ALPIN 6
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Quilometragem
Barum Polaris 5
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Michelin ALPIN 6
94%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Preço/valor
Barum Polaris 5
86%
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
Michelin ALPIN 6
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Barum Polaris 5
82%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Michelin ALPIN 6
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Gelo

Gelo
Barum Polaris 5
82%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Michelin ALPIN 6
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Travagem brusca
Barum Polaris 5
77%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Michelin ALPIN 6
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Barum Polaris 5
87%
Sava Eskimo HP2
87%
Michelin ALPIN 6
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação