4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Barum Polaris 5 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test profile

Barum
Polaris 5
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Número de testes
13
23
15
3
14
Best position
#9
#1
#6
#4
#1
Average position
15.2
6.7
15.5
4.3
3.6
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
76
107
28
97
188

Molhado

Molhado
Barum Polaris 5
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Barum Polaris 5
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Frenagem úmida
Barum Polaris 5
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Barum Polaris 5
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Barum Polaris 5
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
Barum Polaris 5
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Neve

Neve
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Travagem de neve
Barum Polaris 5
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Tracção na neve
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Manipulação da neve
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Encanto da neve
Barum Polaris 5
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Seco

Seco
Barum Polaris 5
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Travagem a seco
Barum Polaris 5
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Manuseamento a seco
Barum Polaris 5
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Comportamento em condução seca
Barum Polaris 5
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%

Conforto

Conforto
Barum Polaris 5
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Ruído exterior
Barum Polaris 5
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Conforto
Barum Polaris 5
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ruído interior
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Custos

Custos
Barum Polaris 5
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Quilometragem
Barum Polaris 5
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Resistência ao rolamento
Barum Polaris 5
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Preço/valor
Barum Polaris 5
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Gelo

Gelo
Barum Polaris 5
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Travagem brusca
Barum Polaris 5
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação