4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Barum Polaris 5 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Test profile

Barum
Polaris 5
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Número de testes
13
23
3
29
Best position
#9
#1
#4
#1
Average position
15.2
6.7
4.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
76
107
97
178

Molhado

Molhado
Barum Polaris 5
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Frenagem úmida
Barum Polaris 5
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Barum Polaris 5
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Barum Polaris 5
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Barum Polaris 5
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Barum Polaris 5
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%

Neve

Neve
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Tracção na neve
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Travagem de neve
Barum Polaris 5
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Manipulação da neve
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Encanto da neve
Barum Polaris 5
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%

Seco

Seco
Barum Polaris 5
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Travagem a seco
Barum Polaris 5
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Manuseamento a seco
Barum Polaris 5
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Barum Polaris 5
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Ruído exterior
Barum Polaris 5
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Conforto
Barum Polaris 5
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Ruído interior
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%

Custos

Custos
Barum Polaris 5
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Quilometragem
Barum Polaris 5
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
Resistência ao rolamento
Barum Polaris 5
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Preço/valor
Barum Polaris 5
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%

Gelo

Gelo
Barum Polaris 5
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Travagem brusca
Barum Polaris 5
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação