4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Barum Polaris 3 vs. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Barum
Polaris 3
Dunlop
SP Winter Response 2
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
10
10
14
3
17
Best position
#3
#1
#3
#4
#1
Average position
10.6
4.2
16.0
4.3
1.7
Teste mais recente
2018
2022
2020
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
67
28
66
97
80

Molhado

Molhado
Barum Polaris 3
74%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
84%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Barum Polaris 3
65%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
86%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Frenagem úmida
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
83%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
90%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
87%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%

Neve

Neve
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
86%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Barum Polaris 3
89%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
87%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Travagem de neve
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
89%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Encanto da neve
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manipulação da neve
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
89%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Custos

Custos
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
83%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Quilometragem
Barum Polaris 3
68%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
72%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Preço/valor
Barum Polaris 3
81%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
60%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Conforto

Conforto
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
73%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Conforto
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Ruído exterior
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
68%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%

Seco

Seco
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
75%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
82%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Manuseamento a seco
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação