4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
8
49
23
17
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
13.6
3.2
6.7
1.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
29
213
107
80

Molhado

Molhado
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Frenagem úmida
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Curva em círculo molhado
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%

Neve

Neve
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Travagem de neve
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Encanto da neve
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manipulação da neve
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Custos

Custos
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Quilometragem
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
28%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Preço/valor
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Seco

Seco
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
41%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Manuseamento a seco
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Conforto
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação